Tuesday, September 28, 2010

The new paradigm and future problems

One phrase is extremely popular lately - "cloud computing". Some people call it new paradigm, the next thing, the new wave, or even sexy, but it could actually lead to some problems.


Cloud computing is a general term for anything that involves delivering hosted services over the Internet. These services are broadly divided into three categories: Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS), Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) and Software-as-a-Service (SaaS). The name cloud computing was inspired by the cloud symbol that's often used to represent the Internet in flowcharts and diagrams.

A cloud service has three distinct characteristics that differentiate it from traditional hosting. It is sold on demand, typically by the minute or the hour; it is elastic -- a user can have as much or as little of a service as they want at any given time; and the service is fully managed by the provider (the consumer needs nothing but a personal computer and Internet access).

You could have public cloud, community one, private, a hybrid one and you probably think that you've never used it, but think again - Zoho, Google apps, online storage for you files, online backup system, even GMAIL and HOTMAIL, Skype, Google Voice, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Picassa, YouTube, Flickr, and torrent sites - they all are using this paradigm.

Cloud services free businesses and consumers from having to invest in hardware or install software on their devices. They reduce maintenance and hardware upgrading needs; because the solutions are all Web-based, even older computers can be used to access cloud services.

For mobile workers especially, cloud computing provides incredible flexibility: professionals can work from any computing device anywhere as long as they have access to the Web. It also makes collaboration easier especially for virtual team.

And with all the positive sides of the technology, you also get the downside: you need to have an Internet access, the service should have 99.9% uptime, security issues, and how reliable the service you are using is in terms of could it go out of business soon and leave you without your entire collection of pictures, files, work, music, and etc.

The other major problem is different clouds. You can use Google, Amazon's cloud, Microsoft's one, and a thousand more - for every service, software or job you need, but there is no interoperability between them. 
 And the world of cloud computing APIs has been constantly evolving since this highly-scalable architecture first gained attention less than five years ago, but it is an area with great expectations and little commanding consensus of architecture - so far. There is a lack of consistency in cloud APIs. There is also no long term vision about where the paradigm is going.

IBM published the Open Cloud Manifesto, a document that was supposed to lay the tracks for openness and interoperability in cloud computing but which was rejected by the industry's major players - Google, Amazon, Salesforce.com and Microsoft. The whole paradigm needs not only standards compliance today, but also a unified approach to evolving those standards and a way to deal with future problems.
When YuvalShavit asked Steven Yi, Microsoft’s director of product management for the Azure Services Platform, how he thought the cloud manifesto should have been drafted, and what Microsoft would like to see in it, his answered: “I don't necessarily think there needs to be a manifesto as long as we're delivering on customer needs” and interoperating with other services, he said. During their talk Yi emphasizes also that Azure is standards-compliant and that the company is constantly talking to its developers.

The cloud computing it is still in it's infacy, and this approach that approach is working for now, but it doesn't leave much room for the inevitable differences that will arise between cloud computing platforms. 



Tuesday, September 21, 2010

Flexible e-paper display

Technocrats constantly say that one or another technology will "kill" the paper book. So far predictions like that hold no ground. But maybe after the introduction of e-reader, another advancement in technology would allow for the wider spread of e-books. That innovation is the flexible e-paper, which could potentially pave the way to rollable, twistable ereaders, which will increase the resilience to breakage.

Regardless which tech blog you visit - there will be a mention about the new Sony flexible e-paper that was presented at 2010 Dealer Convention. Sony aren’t saying what exactly they’ve done to the e-ink technology itself but it’s said to use a plastic substrate rather than the usual glass panel.

Other companies also attempted to commercialize flexible e-paper - LG revealed earlier in the year their optimized flexible e-paper for Newspapers.The e-paper is virtually paper-thin with thickness of only 0.3 millimeters. It uses thin-film-transistor on metal foil rather than glass substrate to give the device flexibility. Measuring 25 centimeters by 40 centimeters (9.8 in. by 15.7 in), it weighs only 130 grams, though it will get thicker and heavier if a manufacturer wires it up with touchscreen technology to give full Internet access.  LG says the new flexible e-paper can also be wrapped around pillars and other locations for advertisement applications.

Right now LG has 19 in prototype, which is just the e-paper by itself, without any processor, input device or storage. Adding in these different components would make the paper far less flexible and far less like the newspaper format it’s currently trying to mimic. That’s not to say there aren’t any devices already slotted to use this new technology. Quite the contrary.

Another exciting device is the upcoming Skiff Reader (device from Hearst) which is a 11.5 inch screen that uses the same LG panel technology. The Skiff service will let users directly download magazine issues, books and newspapers. 

But the company that introduced the full-color flexible e- paper to the market is actually Bridgestone.  Their device is a A4 sized full-color resembling a flexible piece of plastic, and complete with a touch screen surface provided by a WACOM tablet. The main difference is that they use another technology for the e-paper. According to ePaperCentral, “unlike other e-paper devices like the Kindle and Sony’s 505/700, the Bridgestone model does not use E Ink based technologies. Instead, it uses a powerful technology built in house that could completely revolutionize e-paper called QR-LPD.”

And according to market researcher DisplaySearch the e-book market would grow to $1.2 billion next year from $370 million last year. If prices drop quickly, newspaper companies could do away with printing and distributing millions of sheets of paper in the not-too-distant future.
Sony flexible e-paper
LG flexible e-paper

Tuesday, September 14, 2010

The search for unoccupied radio waves

Next week FCC will see a proposal for white spaces.
What does white spaces mean - they are unoccupied radio waves. If FCC adopts the rule for it, WIFI will have new areas to explore, develop and use frequencies of higher power, which means that the signal could cover miles and according to research even go through walls.
One of the roadblocks for defining white spaces is that the available frequencies vary from market to market. But Neeraj Srivaspaba from Spectrum Bridge Inc, offers a suggestion: geo-location database (Spectrum Bridge developed the DB). The idea is to use some sort of geo-location before it can start transmitting, used in GPS or cell towers for example. Basically it has to figure out its latitude and longitude, the information is sent to a database and the database returns an answer whether it can use the channels. The remaining question is how often the devices have to check with the database. In most cases where Spectrum Bridge Inc tested it used converted AirSpan WiMax gear with no attempt to encode for maximum throughput.
Microsoft has already switched on its campus-wide white-space network (using only 2 hotspots for200-hectare). The Redmond company wants unrestricted access on detect-and-avoid technology to establish which frequencies are used and avoid them. This is actually might not work for both technical and architectural reasons.
One major problem could be the medical devices. Apparently they use white spaces since 1988, even though in 1998 FCC allocated channel 37 for all healthcare devices. But most of them haven’t made the switch because it will be expensive.
And if the FCC gives the green light for the project, a IEEE committee will be established with the name 802.11AF. If all the political fights were handled correctly, this might be a major push towards new WIFI development. Of course I remain skeptic to see how the big players will react and will we see something resembling a whole wireless planet, where we could find easily hotspots, with better speed and cover, or we will witness some fragmentation of the market and oligopoly, closed networks and etc. This is not something new - it dates from 2007 but it is important if a decision is reached - then a change will begin thus creating a new wave of development.

















References:
 here and here